Activity for scottbb
| Type | On... | Excerpt | Status | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comment | Post #289075 |
Ah, I gotcha. That makes sense now. Yeah, I have to admit my initial enthusiasm quickly waned. And in truth, I think the internet in general isn't very interested in photography Q&A anymore. Photo-SE is close to being a graveyard. I think now that computational photography in phones is looking so goo... (more) |
— | 7 months ago |
| Comment | Post #289075 |
> This site was badly hurt by importing lots of old content from SE.
What content was imported from Photo-SE? I know that [I originally advocated for some content to be imported](https://photography.codidact.com/posts/75032), but to my knowledge, **none of it** was imported. Indeed, the later edit... (more) |
— | 7 months ago |
| Comment | Post #75032 |
@OlinLathrop you're right. Also, in retrospect, you're right about not migrating in questions from PSE. Rather than take this list / these answers as migration suggestions, these perhaps might be good starting points for seeding FAQs. (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #276841 |
The question wasn't about linking to/from SE. Furthermore, frequent linking at SE to here seems like rather poor form — if Codidact wants to advertise at SE, there's a way to do that. But I'm wary of "expat" linking at SE to drive away traffic. (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #276715 |
I posted a bug in meta.codidact.com, referencing this bug report. (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #276518 |
is this image cropped? (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #275855 |
Good to see you back Matthew! (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #275791 |
No toes stepped on Charlie. Thanks for getting this started! =) (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #75032 |
contrary to what I was I thinking when I asked the question, it seems I'm just creating lists of individual questions. Hmm... (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #75030 |
@CharlieBrumbaugh Well, it all depends on the specifics of usage. If the legs are spread wide so the camera is low, the wobble is substantially reduced. If the legs are wrapped around the right branch, that can possibly eliminate the wobble, _perhaps_. It's very situational. The one thing that can de... (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #74975 |
sorry, just realized that last comment sounded horribly entitled. I should have said it was "relatively" miserable. I very much had first world problems, all things considered. (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #74975 |
Sorry, I was going to reply shortly after you posted, but in short, yes, I just got busy. I was visiting family when covid hit, so I was away from my computer for 2 months. Trying to answer questions and edit Markdown on an iPad, while being a guest in somebody else's house, was absolutely miserable.... (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #74939 |
When you say it doesn't need to be tall, 6–12" would work, do you mean 6–12" when folded/compacted, or do you mean 6–12" when extended? (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |