Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Meta

Comments on Should Photography & Video go through the Community Proposals system?

Parent

Should Photography & Video go through the Community Proposals system?

+7
−0

Unfortunately, activity on Photography & Video Codidact is very low. Outside of Meta, the community has attracted a total of 41 top-level posts across 4 different categories since being started in May 2020, and it doesn't look like this is set to increase at the moment.

We've recently spun up Community Proposals, a place to incubate new community proposals. With Proposals.CD, Q&A and articles can be posted the same way they would be on a live community. When a proposal reaches critical mass, it can be spun off onto its own community with the content all ready to go.

Photography & Video predates that system significantly. However, due to the low level of activity, does it make sense to step back a bit and send Photo "back" to the Proposals ground, in order to gain some traction before having its own full-fledged community? This would allow for the community to organically develop without having a "dead" community on our network, potentially scaring contributors off by its inactivity.

Is this is a good idea?

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

0 comment threads

Post
+5
−2

Yes, this is a good idea.

If you do that, seed the proposal with the new top level posts generated here from the Q&A category. Skip the other categories for now. Contests is cute, but there is nothing much worth saving that couldn't get re-created if people actually want it. It's debatable whether FAQ or Gear Recommendations should even be there at all. That's part of what the proposal phase should settle. There are also very few posts in those categories anyway.

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

1 comment thread

What was imported from Photo-SE? (4 comments)
What was imported from Photo-SE?
scottbb‭ wrote 7 months ago

This site was badly hurt by importing lots of old content from SE.

What content was imported from Photo-SE? I know that I originally advocated for some content to be imported, but to my knowledge, none of it was imported. Indeed, the later edited-in comment at the end of my post states, "In retrospect, I'm glad questions weren't migrated in from Photo-SE."

Olin Lathrop‭ wrote 7 months ago

It looks like you are right. I think I was confusing this site with Outdoors. That makes the inactivity here even more pitiful, since it can't be blamed on search engine blacklisting.

scottbb‭ wrote 7 months ago

Ah, I gotcha. That makes sense now. Yeah, I have to admit my initial enthusiasm quickly waned. And in truth, I think the internet in general isn't very interested in photography Q&A anymore. Photo-SE is close to being a graveyard. I think now that computational photography in phones is looking so good, and the price of DSLRs/MILCs is so high compared to phones, and the quality isn't noticeably better (from a simple point-and-shoot-and-share/post standpoint), I think dedicated camera photography is sort of going the way of film photography: hobbyist/enthusiast, and professionals, and that's it.

Olin Lathrop‭ wrote 4 months ago

scottbb‭: I have deleted the erroneous part of my answer talking about imported content.