Post History
Unfortunately, activity on Photography & Video Codidact is very low. Outside of Meta, the community has attracted a total of 41 top-level posts across 4 different categories since being started...
Question
discussion
#3: Post edited
by
trichoplax
·
2023-07-23T17:09:40Z (over 1 year ago)
Typo
Should Photography & Video go through the Community Proposals system?
#2: Post edited
by
trichoplax
·
2023-07-23T17:09:40Z (over 1 year ago)
Typo
Should Photography & Video go through the Community Proposals system?
- Unfortunately, activity on Photography & Video Codidact is very low. Outside of Meta, the community has attracted a total of 41 top-level posts across 4 different categories since being started in May 2020, and it doesn't look like this is set to increase at the moment.
We've recently spun up [Community Proposals](https://proposals.codidact.com), a place to incubate new community propsals. With Proposals.CD, Q&A and articles can be posted the same way they would be on a live community. When a proposal reaches critical mass, it can be spun off onto its own community with the content all ready to go.- Photography & Video predates that system significantly. However, due to the low level of activity, does it make sense to step back a bit and send Photo "back" to the Proposals ground, in order to gain some traction before having its own full-fledged community? This would allow for the community to organically develop without having a "dead" community on our network, potentially scaring contributors off by its inactivity.
- Is this is a good idea?
- Unfortunately, activity on Photography & Video Codidact is very low. Outside of Meta, the community has attracted a total of 41 top-level posts across 4 different categories since being started in May 2020, and it doesn't look like this is set to increase at the moment.
- We've recently spun up [Community Proposals](https://proposals.codidact.com), a place to incubate new community proposals. With Proposals.CD, Q&A and articles can be posted the same way they would be on a live community. When a proposal reaches critical mass, it can be spun off onto its own community with the content all ready to go.
- Photography & Video predates that system significantly. However, due to the low level of activity, does it make sense to step back a bit and send Photo "back" to the Proposals ground, in order to gain some traction before having its own full-fledged community? This would allow for the community to organically develop without having a "dead" community on our network, potentially scaring contributors off by its inactivity.
- Is this is a good idea?
#1: Initial revision
by
Mithical
·
2023-07-23T12:54:35Z (over 1 year ago)
Should Photography & Video go through the Community Proposals system?
Unfortunately, activity on Photography & Video Codidact is very low. Outside of Meta, the community has attracted a total of 41 top-level posts across 4 different categories since being started in May 2020, and it doesn't look like this is set to increase at the moment. We've recently spun up [Community Proposals](https://proposals.codidact.com), a place to incubate new community propsals. With Proposals.CD, Q&A and articles can be posted the same way they would be on a live community. When a proposal reaches critical mass, it can be spun off onto its own community with the content all ready to go. Photography & Video predates that system significantly. However, due to the low level of activity, does it make sense to step back a bit and send Photo "back" to the Proposals ground, in order to gain some traction before having its own full-fledged community? This would allow for the community to organically develop without having a "dead" community on our network, potentially scaring contributors off by its inactivity. Is this is a good idea?