Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Meta

Post History

71%
+3 −0
Meta What is on topic for gear recommendations?

I’m fairly active in the moderation queues at Photo-SE; I also have fairly strong opinions on this topic. Where can I buy this particular camera? Is this particular model a good camera? Is this ...

posted 4y ago by scottbb‭  ·  edited 4y ago by scottbb‭

Answer
#2: Post edited by user avatar scottbb‭ · 2020-05-12T22:01:08Z (over 4 years ago)
  • I’m fairly active in the moderation queues at Photo-SE; I also have fairly strong opinions on this topic.
  • >1. Where can I buy this particular camera?
  • >2. Is this particular model a good camera?
  • >3. Is this camera at this price a good deal?
  • These should absolutely be off-topic. These questions are too specific to time, location, and/or market conditions. These are solid _chaff_.
  • >4. Is this camera selling company reputable or am I going to end up being scammed?
  • This should be off-topic, IMO. Essentially, the answer is “Your mileage may vary”, too subject to anecdote.
  • >5. Should I buy camera X or camera Y?
  • Off-topic, but workable into a better question. These questions belie at least a minimal amount of research and/or selection criteria. Usually, the asker hasn’t made their criteria explicit, but sometimes the asker responds to comments requesting more information, in order to make the question better.
  • >6. These are the features I am looking for and this is my budget, can you recommend a camera for me?
  • On-topic. Pretty good, although I’m personally inclined to recommend a general class or groups of products rather than a _specific_ product (unless the asker has already pre-decided a specific brand for whatever reason).
  • >7. I am selling this type of camera, how much is it worth and where should I sell it?
  • Off-topic. “Worth” is highly variable. Furthermore, this question usually is from people who are either getting out of photography, or from people who inherited/acquired old equipment looking to unload it. In those cases, this question is the opposite of encouraging the practice and community of photography.
  • ----
  • >What features should I look for in a camera?
  • This seems like a perfect FAQ question, or set of FAQs (“... for hiking?”, “... for astrophotography?”, etc.)
  • ----
  • What are the ideal recommendation questions? I think @mattdm’s [answer to this site’s proposal subject in Meta-CD](https://meta.codidact.com/a/74831/74837) covers it pretty well:
  • > There is no "best", but "What camera is best?" is the default question. We need a way to guide people into asking "**What camera is best for _me_ for _this particular situation_ given _these constraints_?**"
  • I’m fairly active in the moderation queues at Photo-SE; I also have fairly strong opinions on this topic.
  • >1. Where can I buy this particular camera?
  • >2. Is this particular model a good camera?
  • >3. Is this camera at this price a good deal?
  • These should absolutely be off-topic. These questions are too specific to time, location, and/or market conditions. These are solid _chaff_.
  • >Is this camera selling company reputable or am I going to end up being scammed?
  • This should be off-topic, IMO. Essentially, the answer is “Your mileage may vary”, too subject to anecdote.
  • >Should I buy camera X or camera Y?
  • Off-topic, but workable into a better question. These questions belie at least a minimal amount of research and/or selection criteria. Usually, the asker hasn’t made their criteria explicit, but sometimes the asker responds to comments requesting more information, in order to make the question better.
  • >These are the features I am looking for and this is my budget, can you recommend a camera for me?
  • On-topic. Pretty good, although I’m personally inclined to recommend a general class or groups of products rather than a _specific_ product (unless the asker has already pre-decided a specific brand for whatever reason).
  • >I am selling this type of camera, how much is it worth and where should I sell it?
  • Off-topic. “Worth” is highly variable. Furthermore, this question usually is from people who are either getting out of photography, or from people who inherited/acquired old equipment looking to unload it. In those cases, this question is the opposite of encouraging the practice and community of photography.
  • ----
  • >What features should I look for in a camera?
  • This seems like a perfect FAQ question, or set of FAQs (“... for hiking?”, “... for astrophotography?”, etc.)
  • ----
  • What are the ideal recommendation questions? I think @mattdm’s [answer to this site’s proposal subject in Meta-CD](https://meta.codidact.com/a/74831/74837) covers it pretty well:
  • > There is no "best", but "What camera is best?" is the default question. We need a way to guide people into asking "**What camera is best for _me_ for _this particular situation_ given _these constraints_?**"
#1: Initial revision by user avatar scottbb‭ · 2020-05-12T21:59:33Z (over 4 years ago)
I’m fairly active in the moderation queues at Photo-SE; I also have fairly strong opinions on this topic.

>1. Where can I buy this particular camera?
>2. Is this particular model a good camera?
>3. Is this camera at this price a good deal?

These should absolutely be off-topic. These questions are too specific to time, location, and/or market conditions. These are solid _chaff_.

>4. Is this camera selling company reputable or am I going to end up being scammed?

This should be off-topic, IMO. Essentially, the answer is “Your mileage may vary”, too subject to anecdote. 

>5. Should I buy camera X or camera Y?

Off-topic, but workable into a better question. These questions belie at least a minimal amount of research and/or selection criteria. Usually, the asker hasn’t made their criteria explicit, but sometimes the asker responds to comments requesting more information, in order to make the question better.

>6. These are the features I am looking for and this is my budget, can you recommend a camera for me?

On-topic. Pretty good, although I’m personally inclined to recommend a  general class or groups of products rather than a _specific_ product (unless the asker has already pre-decided a specific brand for whatever reason).

>7. I am selling this type of camera, how much is it worth and where should I sell it?

Off-topic. “Worth” is highly variable. Furthermore, this question usually is from people who are either getting out of photography, or from people who inherited/acquired old equipment looking to unload it. In those cases, this question is the opposite of encouraging the practice and community of photography.

----

>What features should I look for in a camera?

This seems like a perfect FAQ question, or set of FAQs (“... for hiking?”, “... for astrophotography?”, etc.)

----

What are the ideal recommendation questions? I think @mattdm’s [answer to this site’s proposal subject in Meta-CD](https://meta.codidact.com/a/74831/74837) covers it pretty well:

> There is no "best", but "What camera is best?" is the default question. We need a way to guide people into asking "**What camera is best for _me_ for _this particular situation_ given _these constraints_?**"