Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Apply unsharp mask before or after downsizing to final size?

+6
−0

For sharpening photos out of a DSLR, where the final result will be at a lower size compared to the DSLR's output (for example, for publishing on the web), is it better to:

  • apply (possibly slightly more) unsharp mask, then downsize? or
  • downsize, then apply unsharp mask to taste at the final image size?

I'm looking for what produces the most visually appealing output -- clearer details than in the comparatively soft DSLR image, but not oversharpened.

Intuitively, it's easier to get the right amount of unsharp mask with the image at the final size (because one can immediately judge the results); but does this deprive the filter of data that could have been used to produce a better-looking result?

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

0 comment threads

1 answer

+3
−0

You could do it either way, but it is usually better to apply effects that depend on the size or resolution of the picture on the final-sized picture. This is assuming, of course, that proper anti-aliasing is always done along with any resolution reduction.

The visual effect of blurring is dependent on the resolution and also the final viewed size of the image. It is therefore more straight-forward to apply such effects on the final-sized picture, because that's the only place the result can be judged.

Note that effects that do not depend on resolution or viewing size (like color balance, for example) are best applied to the highest resolution possible. Any manipulation of the original can introduce quantization and other noise. If applied to the full res picture, the filtering process to shrink to the final resolution provides some attenuation of that noise. In effect, you are using the higher spatial resolution in the original to get more color resolution in the final version.

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

0 comment threads

Sign up to answer this question »